Integrated report 2020
Assurance is implemented in terms of a three-tier system, aligned with the guidelines of Exxaro's Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve reporting procedure, summarised as follows.
In 2020, tier 1 assurance was undertaken for the Grootegeluk, Matla, Dorstfontein and Forzando operations. The Mineral Resource fact packs indicated that an update of the Coal Resource estimate was required either due to additional information being available or as recommended by previous audits. Geological data validation, data analysis and subsequent updating of geological and structural models were concluded in the reporting period. These models were peer reviewed by geosciences central experts for the four operations and the models were signed off by the applicable competent persons and their supporting technical teams. Findings from the reviews were incorporated during the model update process. All the Mineral Reserve fact packs of Exxaro operations were reviewed in the reporting year. The Grootegeluk, Belfast and Leeuwpan LoM plans were subsequently updated. In addition, the Grootegeluk and Belfast strategies were reviewed, leading to optimisation of the LoM plans. The Leeuwpan mine layout was reviewed to accommodate the OL power line and bridge pit as well as an overburden (OVB) dump. An internal review of Matla's LoM plan was carried out in March 2020 with no findings reported.
Table 2 below indicates the tier 2 technical assurances conducted during the reporting year. Where technical findings were identified during reviews that may materially impact the business, remedial actions were recommended to ensure project robustness and shareholder return.

Table 2: Tier 2 technical assurances conducted in the reporting year with general points addressed
| Project name | Project description | Resource Actions | Reserve Actions |
| Grootegeluk complex alternative mining solution prefeasibility study | Evaluation of optimisation alternatives to traditional truck and shovel methodology for overburden handling and placement over LoM |
|
|
| Leeuwpan heavy mining equipment strategy | Reviewed every three years to ensure optimal and fit-for-purpose heavy mining equipment capacity to achieve production targets | Reviewed the dilution and loss modifying factors to ensure alignment with the equipment strategy | |
| Belfast implementation project phase 2 | Aimed to increase production throughput at Belfast mine |
|
|
| Matla Mine 1 | Aims to establish a new mine entrance to access Reserves |
|
|
| Matla north-west access | Aims to traverse between coal seams to access Reserves |
|
Aligned LoM plan to project schedule |
| Grootegeluk backfill phase 3 | This project is the third phase in the geographical extension of the Grootegeluk complex discard handling and backfill system | Impact of material types and availability thereof to be established for designs and construction philosophies | Revised LoM schedule to ensure that the mining operation and the backfilling operation are synchronised and hauling is minimised |
On tier 3, in 2020, process audits were done by EY for the Belfast operation. The audit scope was limited to the following modules:
Conclusion: The overall review of the Coal Resources and Reserves, as well as the LoM plan processes, are in line with industry norms. EY identified housekeeping recommendations that will enhance the process. No material findings were reported while some improvements have been implemented. The additional recommendations noted in the audit are summarised in the table below and corrective measures, where applicable, were put in place.
The Coal Resource has been prepared and documented in accordance with the SAMREC Code and SANS 102320:2004 requirements and the process and methodologies are considered fit-for-purpose and considered to be within industry norms. The review of the geological model and Coal Resource classification has identified a number of recommendations, which are largely considered good housekeeping to improve future model and as such do not materially affect the Coal Resource estimate.
Table 3: Tier 3 external audit additional recommendations
| Area under review | Conclusion and recommendation | |
|
Data collection review |
EY considers the drilling, sampling and assaying methodology employed at Exxaro to be appropriate for the relevant coalfields as outlined by the reviewed standard operating procedures. |
|
|
Geological modelling |
The geological modelling parameters were reviewed and found to be appropriate for the style of mineralisation. |
|
|
Coal Resource classification |
The process followed in estimating the Belfast Coal Resources does not appear to be unreasonable and is in line with industry norms. EY has confirmed the Coal Resource classification using the distances provided in SANS but does recommend reviewing any Coal Resources that may be considered "spotted dog" classification. This does not materially impact the Coal Resource classification at Belfast. |
|
|
Surface rights |
EY is satisfied that the surface rights for the mining operation in the near term are secured. From observations in the surface rights review, Exxaro has put in place the necessary monitoring controls to manage any risks associated with the surface rights acquisitions. |
|

The Coal Reserves haVE been prepared and documented in accordance with the SAMREC Code guideline and the mine design and LoM scheduling processes as per Exxaro's standard procedures. The overall process reviewed is in line with industry norms. The review of the mine design and LoM scheduling has identified a number of recommendations, which are largely considered as good housekeeping to improve the process in future. As such, they do not materially affect the current estimated Coal Reserves.
| Area under review | Conclusion and recommendation | |
Exploitation strategy |
EY is satisfied with the process followed in establishing the business case for the operation and identified the ultimately mineable ore blocks for inclusion in the Coal Reserve estimate. The exploitation strategy process appears to have followed an appropriate process and it is in line with industry norms. |
|
Mine design |
The mine design process followed does not appear unreasonable. However, EY has identified that the geotechnical study may not be sufficient to inform the mine design as the project matures. The following recommendation should be taken into consideration: further geotechnical investigations with more detailed geotechnical parameters should be conducted to form part of the mine design as the project matures (slope angles). |
|
Modifying factors |
The modifying factors used in converting Coal Resources to Coal Reserves do not appear unreasonable. However, no reconciliation of the modifying factors to operational performance has been done yet as Belfast is still in project phase. The following recommendation should be taken into consideration: as the project progresses, management should reconcile the mine design parameters/technical assumptions with the actual performance to assess the reasonability of the modifying factors used in determining the 2019 Coal Reserves. |
|
LoM plan |
The LoM plan for Belfast does not appear to be unreasonable. However, based on a review of the 2020 business unit production results, it appears that Belfast may be lagging behind its production targets, which is not unexpected considering the ramp-up stage of the operation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. EY therefore acknowledges the revised targets set with consideration of the COVID-19 impact. |
|
Coal Reserve estimation |
The competent person who signs off the Belfast Coal Reserves appears to be adequately qualified and sufficiently experienced to assume the role of competent person for the operation as per SAMREC Code guidelines and compliance with Exxaro's' mineral asset policy. The process followed in estimating the Belfast Coal Resources does not appear to be unreasonable and is in line with industry norms. |
|
Economic assessment |
The Belfast costs were benchmarked against other South African surface operations as well as other Exxaro operations and were found to be in line with South African coal operation costs. The Belfast operating costs therefore do not appear to be unreasonable considering other surface thermal operations in the same location. The Exxaro prices are not considered to be unreasonable in relative to broker forecast prices. |
